
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
The metro you don't underwrite for cash flow. Silicon Valley's median home is **$1.34M** and the cap rate proxy just **2.0%** — the lowest in the queue. HPI is up **+33.9% over 5 years**; net IRS migration is **−11,555**. Where appreciation, equity, and tech payroll live — not where the math pencils.
The numbers that matter most
What an investor checks first when sizing up a new metro — affordability ratio, rent vs income, cap rate proxy, and where the market is moving. Each metric shown vs. state and national medians for instant context.
expensive
Price to income
8.53×
The single most-cited 'is this market still cheap' check. Below 3× and you're in an affordability tailwind.
- vs California
- 5.95×
- vs U.S.
- 3.43×
Benchmark
ACS median home value ÷ median HHI
moderate
Rent to income
26.5%
What share of a typical household's income goes to rent. Below 30% means tenants can absorb modest rent increases.
- vs California
- 28.8%-2.2
- vs U.S.
- 23.3%
Benchmark
(HUD FMR 2BR × 12) ÷ median HHI
tight
Cap rate proxy
2.0%
Rough first-pass yield assuming a 35% expense ratio. Not an underwriting number — a 'is this even worth modeling' filter.
- vs California
- 3.1%
- vs U.S.
- 4.4%
Benchmark
(FMR 2BR × 12 × 0.65) ÷ ACS median home value
shrinking
Net migration
-0.58%
Forward-looking demand signal. Positive net migration drives rent growth and absorbs new supply.
- vs California
- -0.03%
- vs U.S.
- 0.04%
Benchmark
IRS net migration ÷ population
pipeline accelerating
Permit pipeline
3.23
permits per 1,000 residents
Forward-supply indicator. Above ~5 means the metro is building meaningfully relative to its size; below 2 means supply is tight.
- vs California
- 2.39+0.84
- vs U.S.
- 3.49
Benchmark
Census BPS permits TTM ÷ population × 1,000
softening
Unemployment
4.0%
Tighter unemployment means higher wages, more rental demand, lower vacancy.
- vs California
- 5.2%-1.2
- vs U.S.
- 3.9%
Benchmark
BLS LAUS, latest month
Section index — click any row to jump
What the data says about San Jose
## The metro you don't underwrite for cash flow
San Jose is 1,981,584 residents spread across 2 counties — Santa Clara County contains essentially the entire metro, and tiny San Benito County (the Hollister exurb south of Gilroy) adds the rest. The Census American Community Survey puts the median household income at $153,792 and the median home value at $1,342,700 — the highest of any metro we publish. That single ratio sets up everything else on the page.
The price-to-income ratio is 8.53, more than double the national median of 3.43. The HUD Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom unit prints at $3,483/month — high in absolute terms but only 26.5% of median income, which is lower than you'd expect because the income denominator is so large. Now combine those: at this median home value, gross rent supports a cap rate proxy of just 2.0% — the lowest in any published metro and well under the 4.35% national median. There is no version of this deal that pencils on cash flow alone.
FHFA's House Price Index shows San Jose up +33.9% over the trailing 5 years — meaningfully BELOW the U.S. metro pop-weighted average. The base was already at the ceiling. The most recent 4 quarters print +0.19% YoY, essentially flat. This is what happens when you combine peak prices with a 6%+ mortgage rate: prospective buyers can't qualify, sellers don't need to cut, and the market clears at glacial speed.
## The supply is structurally locked, not just slow
The 2 counties of the metro break down very differently:
- Santa Clara County — The whole valley floor. Every tech HQ that matters (Apple, Google, Nvidia, Meta sit here, and Adobe/eBay/Cisco are within 20 minutes). Census Building Permits Survey shows the county pulled the bulk of the metro's TTM permit count. Population dense enough that the per-1,000 rate prints below the national median even in absolute boom years. Geographic constraints: valley floor built out, hillsides protected, Coyote Valley designated open space.
- San Benito County — Hollister and the surrounding ranch land south of Gilroy. ~64,000 residents, single-digit permits per quarter, an entirely different market and not a meaningful release valve for the valley.
The metro-wide permits-per-1,000 rate of 3.23 sits below the national median of 3.49, but that number understates the supply lock. Santa Clara is one of the most credentialed metros in the country (54.8% of adults hold a bachelor's degree or higher, per ACS Table B15003 — likely the highest in the queue), and it's surrounded on three sides by protected open space and the Diablo Range. Permitting more isn't a policy choice — it's a topology problem.
## What's changing, and what to do about it
IRS Statistics of Income data shows San Jose lost a net −11,555 tax returns in the latest vintage — about −0.58% of the population, a real outflow. But the inbound side tells the more interesting story: the top 5 origin counties are Alameda, San Mateo, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and King County WA. This isn't America-leaving-the-Bay; this is the Bay Area trading itself — Oakland refugees moving into Sunnyvale, Peninsula renters chasing slightly lower prices in San Jose proper, Seattle tech workers transferring into Apple Park. The metro is still the anchor; the residents are just shuffling. That matters because intra-Bay churn doesn't deflate the price floor the way real net out-migration would.
The labor market is loose for a tech metro: unemployment is higher than the national median (3.9%) at the latest BLS print, and the rent-burdened share is 43% — the highest in the queue. Both numbers reflect the same thing: payroll growth has slowed since the 2022 layoffs, but the rent and price levels have not adjusted down.
So:
- If you're hunting cash flow — pass. Walk away. The cap rate proxy is 2.0%, gross rents will not move enough to fix that, and the leverage math is hostile at any mortgage rate above 4%. There are 50+ metros in the queue where the same capital pencils.
- If you're playing appreciation — be patient. The 5-year HPI of +33.9% is the slowest of any high-quality West Coast metro, and the most recent print is +0.19% YoY. This doesn't mean San Jose can't appreciate, but it does mean you're underwriting future tech-payroll growth to recover the holding cost during the wait.
- If you already own here — hold and maximize equity. The intra-Bay migration churn means resale liquidity stays intact even at flat prices, and the bachelor's degree share of 54.8% keeps the long-run rent floor under your unit. Don't sell into a flat market unless the basis is dragging down a stronger deal somewhere else.
Where prices are and where they've been
FHFA House Price Index — repeat-sales index across the metro, sized against this metro's median household income and benchmarked against the Indiana metros average and U.S. metros average.
5-year price appreciation
+33.9%
FHFA HPI · Q1 2020 → Q4 2025
+0.2% YoY
$1,342,700 median home value
San Jose home prices climbed 33.9% over the last 5 years according to the FHFA repeat-sales index — a modest appreciation pace for a Midwest metro of this size. The 1-year change has cooled to 0.2%, signaling the post-2022 surge has unwound into steady-state appreciation.
See the chart below for how the metro's appreciation curve stacks up against the Indiana metros average and the U.S. metros average. The gap between the metro and the national line is the "catch-up" or "lag" signal — and the slope tells you whether the gap is widening or closing.

How to read this chart
- 01San Jose's HPI rose **+33.9% over 5 years** — about a third less than the U.S. metros pop-weighted average. The base was already high, so the percentage compounding had less room.
- 02Year-over-year is **+0.19%** — essentially flat. The most recent 4 quarters show San Jose printing the smallest annual change of any major Bay Area metro.
- 03California metros (orange) ran **below** San Jose for most of the window — Los Angeles, Sacramento, and the Central Valley pulled the state average down. San Jose tracks national, not state.
- 04The flat-line for 2024 is structurally interesting: Santa Clara's median home value sits at $1.34M with a 6%+ mortgage rate, which means most prospective buyers are priced out and inventory clears slowly. Prices stop moving when nobody can afford them.
- 05Underwriting rule: do NOT extrapolate the **+8% to +10%** YoY peaks from 2020-2022 forward. That was a zero-rate, post-COVID, work-from-home pulse. The 2024-2025 leg is the new normal here.
Where the value tier sits — top 2 counties by home value
| County | Median home value | Median HHI | Price-to-income | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Clara County | $1,382,800 | $159,674 | 8.66× | stretched |
| San Benito County | $751,500 | $108,289 | 6.94× | stretched |
How to read the FHFA House Price Index
FHFA HPI is a repeat-sales index — it tracks the price change of the same properties over time, smoothing out new construction and luxury transactions. It's built from the mortgage data the GSEs (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) already see, which makes it free of MLS survey error and immune to listing-feed gaps.
- 01Repeat-sales method. Tracks the same properties over time, so new construction and luxury transactions don't skew the trend.
- 02Federally sourced. Built from GSE mortgage data — no MLS survey error, no commercial license required to publish.
- 03Slope, not level. Watch the slope of the line, not the absolute index value — a steepening curve is a more reliable buy signal than the level.
The rent ladder
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count, sized against this metro's median household income and benchmarked vs Indiana and the U.S.
Typical 2-bedroom rent
$3,483
/ month · HUD FMR FY 2026
26.5% of median HHI
A typical 2-bedroom in costs the median household 26.5% of their income — 3.3 points above the U.S. average (23.3%) 2.2 points below California (28.8%).
HUD calls anything above 30% "rent-burdened." This metro sits comfortably under that line, which means tenants can absorb modest rent increases — and landlords have headroom on rent hikes before pushing tenants out of the market.
Fair Market Rent — by bedroom count
| Bedroom | Monthly | Annual | % of median HHI | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BR | $2,982 | $35.8K | 22.7% | comfortable |
| 2 BR | $3,483 | $41.8K | 26.5% | moderate |
| 3 BR | $4,602 | $55.2K | 35.1% | rent-burdened |
Why HUD Fair Market Rent matters
FMR is HUD's 40th-percentile rent estimate by bedroom count — refreshed every fiscal year, sourced from Census surveys (not commercial listing data), and used as the cap for Section 8 voucher payments. Three things investors should know:
- 01Defensible benchmark. Federal source, no commercial license required to publish or compare against.
- 02Section 8 ceiling. A property at or below FMR is voucher-eligible — government-paid rent at the FMR cap.
- 03Conservative estimate. 40th percentile means more than half of actual market rents in the metro come in higher.
Labor market direction
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — LAUS (unemployment) + CES (nonfarm employment), benchmarked against the U.S. average.
Unemployment rate
4.0%
BLS LAUS · latest month
San Jose's labor market is softening, with unemployment running at 4.0% — 0.1 points above the U.S. metros average (3.9%).
For an investor, tighter unemployment means higher wages, more rental demand, and lower vacancy. The trend chart below shows how the metro's unemployment has moved over the last 30 months.
Unemployment rate
4.0%
Nonfarm jobs
—
Median household income
$157,444
ACS 5-year
How to read the labor market
Two BLS series tell you almost everything you need about a metro's labor market: LAUS (unemployment, refreshed monthly) and CES (nonfarm payroll counts, refreshed monthly). LAUS is the tightness signal; CES is the size and direction signal.
- 01Unemployment is rental demand. Tighter labor markets mean higher wages and lower vacancy — landlords have pricing power when employers are competing for workers.
- 02YoY change is the trend signal. A negative pp YoY change means the labor market tightened over the last year — usually a leading indicator for rent growth.
- 03Nonfarm growth is supply absorption. Positive nonfarm payroll growth absorbs new housing supply and supports the rent + price trajectory together.
What's being built
U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey — trailing 12 months, broken out by structure type, with the YoY change as the directional signal.
Total permits TTM
6,404
Census BPS · trailing 12 months
+86.4% year-over-year
3.23 permits per 1,000 residents
San Jose pulled 6,404 building permits over the trailing 12 months, a meaningful jump 86.4% year-over-year. That works out to 3.23 permits per 1,000 residents, vs the U.S. metros average of 3.49.
Single-family vs multifamily mix matters: 5+ unit permits are lumpy (developers file for entire projects at once), while single-family permits are smoother and more reliable as a demand signal. The chart below breaks out the monthly mix.
Single family
2,034
trailing 12 months
2–4 unit
50
trailing 12 months
5+ unit
4,320
trailing 12 months

How to read this chart
- 01Santa Clara County is essentially the entire metro — 95%+ of the population, 95%+ of the permits, every major tech HQ. San Benito County (Hollister area) is a small exurban add-on south of Gilroy.
- 02Santa Clara's permit total is constrained NOT by demand — every permit gets bought — but by zoning, environmental review, and land scarcity. The valley floor is built out; the hillsides are protected.
- 03Permits per 1,000 residents come in at **3.23** — slightly below the national median of 3.49 — which is artificially LOW because the population denominator is so large (1.93M in Santa Clara County alone).
- 04The bar chart looks empty for San Benito because it IS a small county. ~64,000 residents, single-digit permits per quarter. It's a different market entirely from the valley.
- 05The supply story for San Jose is locked: 100K-permits-per-year would not solve the affordability gap. The constraint is structural, not pipeline.
How to read the supply pipeline
Census BPS publishes building permit counts every month at the county level, by structure type. Single-family permits are the smooth signal — they reflect ongoing builder demand. 5+ unit permits are lumpy and project-level — one apartment approval can spike a month.
- 01Permits per 1,000 residents. The size-adjusted comparison number. Above ~5 means the metro is building meaningfully relative to its population; below 2 means supply is tight.
- 02YoY change is the direction. Year-over-year change in TTM permits tells you whether builders are leaning in or pulling back. Watch this number for trend reversals.
- 03Mix matters for cap rates. Heavy 5+ unit permitting tends to compress cap rates; single-family-dominated pipelines preserve them.
All 2 counties, ranked by population
Census Bureau (population, ACS demographics) + Census Building Permits Survey.

How to read this chart
- 01Two counties — Santa Clara (the big one north of Coyote Valley) and San Benito (the small one south, around Hollister). The metro IS Santa Clara County for all practical purposes.
- 02Santa Clara County's permit-per-1k is constrained by build-out. Even the highest-density Bay Area county can't permit faster than the entitlement timeline allows.
- 03There is no exurb release valve here. Unlike Dallas (Hood, Ellis) or Phoenix (Pinal, Maricopa exurbs), San Jose has nowhere to spread — the Coyote Valley is open space, the Santa Cruz Mountains are protected, and the Diablo Range is uninhabitable.
- 04The map color is uniform because there are only 2 data points. The choropleth's job here is to show the geographic constraint, not the variation.
- 05Investor takeaway: any permit count you see is the entire supply pipeline. There is no pipeline behind the pipeline.
| # | County | Population | Median HHI | Home value | Permits TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santa Clara County | 1,916,831 | $159,674 | $1,382,800 | 6,200 | +89.9% |
| 2 | San Benito County | 64,753 | $108,289 | $751,500 | 204 |
Similar metros nationally
5 metros closest to San Jose by population and median household income — head-to-head on the metrics that matter for an investor.
Peer set
5
metros nearest by population + HHI
San Jose is closest in size to Austin, Sacramento, Portland, Denver.
The table below ranks every metric — green cells mark the best value in the column, rust cells mark the worst. San Jose is highlighted as the focal row.
| Metro | Pop | Med HHI | Home value | P/I | Cap proxy | HPI 5y | Permits/1k | Migration | Unemp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
★San Jose | 1.98M | $157K | $1343K | 8.53× | 2.0% | +33.9% | 3.23 | -0.58% | 4.0% |
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown, TX | 2.30M | $98K | $435K | 4.45× | 3.3% | +34.0% | 11.74 | +0.59% | 3.2% |
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA | 2.39M | $94K | $559K | 5.95× | 3.1% | +32.9% | 4.32 | -0.03% | 4.8% |
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 2.51M | $95K | $527K | 5.57× | 2.8% | +30.6% | 3.31 | +0.05% | 4.9% |
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO | 2.96M | $102K | $570K | 5.57× | 2.9% | +35.6% | 5.27 | +0.21% | 3.6% |
Raleigh-Cary, NC | 1.42M | $96K | $381K | 3.97× | 3.6% | +56.9% | 12.81 | +0.38% | 3.0% |
How to read this comparison
Peer metros are picked by population + median household income — the closest five matches nationally — so the comparison is apples-to-apples on size and economic class. Sun Belt entrants like Las Vegas and Nashville are included when they fall in range, which is why this peer set spans both the Midwest and the Sun Belt.
- 01Green = best in column. The cell with the most-favorable value for that metric, accounting for whether higher or lower is better.
- 02Rust = worst in column. The cell with the least-favorable value. Combined with the green markers, this is your at-a-glance "where does my metro win and where does it lose."
- 03Cap proxy is the yield lens. Cap rate proxy = (FMR 2BR × 12 × 0.65) ÷ median home value. A first-pass yield filter, not an underwriting number — but it puts the peer set on a single comparable scale.
Where people are moving in from
IRS Statistics of Income — Tax Year 2022. Excludes intra-metro suburban churn.
Net migration
-11,555
tax returns · IRS SOI · TY 2022
-0.58% of metro population
5,281 from top origin
The San Jose metro lost −11,555 net IRS tax returns in the most recent vintage — about −0.58% of population, the deepest annual outflow of any tech-heavy metro in the queue. The top inbound flows are NOT from the rest of the country: they're from neighboring Alameda (5,281), San Mateo (4,334), Los Angeles (2,408), and San Francisco (2,181) counties. This is intra-Bay churn, not relocation in.
The IRS data lags by ~2 years (households file taxes the year after they move), but it's the only nationwide county-to-county migration data sourced from administrative records, not survey estimates. The table below shows the top origin counties — the gravitational sources of new residents.
Top origin counties — where new residents are coming from
| Origin county | Tax returns |
|---|---|
| Alameda County, CA | 5,281 |
| San Mateo County, CA | 4,334 |
| Los Angeles County, CA | 2,408 |
| San Francisco County, CA | 2,181 |
| King County, WA | 1,356 |
| San Diego County, CA | 1,228 |
Who lives in San Jose
U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates · 2019–2023 vintage.
Who lives here
- Median age
- 37.8
- Owner-occupancy
- 55.7%
- Bachelor's+
- 54.8%
San Jose relatively young Midwest metro: Median age 37.8, 55.7% owner-occupancy 54.8% holding a bachelor's degree or higher. Stable, educated, and mostly homeowner-driven.
The catch: 43.0% of renter households are rent-burdened (paying 30%+ of income on rent) — high enough to flag as a constraint on rent growth even though the headline rent-to-income ratio looks comfortable.
- Median household income
- $157,444
- Median age
- 37.8
- Bachelor's+ degree
- 54.8%
- Owner-occupancy rate
- 55.7%
- Vacancy rate
- 5.7%
- Rent burdened (30%+)
- 43.0%
Data sources
| Metric | Source | Type | Vintage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home prices | FHFA — House Price Index | Index | Q4 2025 |
| Fair market rents | HUD — Fair Market Rents | Administrative | FY 2026 |
| Unemployment rate | BLS — Local Area Unemployment Statistics | Survey | Jan 2026 |
| Nonfarm employment | BLS — Current Employment Statistics | Survey | Jan 2026 |
| Building permits | Census — Building Permits Survey | Survey | Mar 2026 TTM |
| Migration flows | IRS — Statistics of Income, Migration Data | Administrative | Tax Year 2022 |
| Demographics | Census — American Community Survey 5-Year | Survey | 2019–2023 |
| Household income | Census — American Community Survey 5-Year | Survey | 2019–2023 |
Page last refreshed: April 10, 2026
