Rethinking Rent vs. Buy in HCOL Areas: The Surprising Math
PrepareEpisode #49·10 min·May 19, 2025

Rethinking Rent vs. Buy in HCOL Areas: The Surprising Math

In San Francisco, buying costs 72% more than renting monthly. But there's a hack — house hack in HCOL and invest in LCOL.

Listen on:
Share
Key Takeaways
  1. 01In San Francisco, monthly PITI on a median home runs $8,200 while a comparable rental costs $3,500 — a $4,700 gap every month
  2. 02The 5% rule: multiply home value by 5% for annual ownership cost — if rent is less, renting wins the math
  3. 03Price-to-rent ratio below 15 favors buying, above 20 favors renting — San Francisco sits at 38, while Cleveland and Indianapolis are below 13
  4. 04Geographic arbitrage: rent where you earn income and invest in markets where cash flow actually works — you don't have to live where you invest
Chapters

Show Notes

Show Notes

I'm Martin Maxwell. The median home in San Francisco costs $1.4 million. Put 20% down — $280,000 — and your monthly PITI is about $8,200. A comparable rental in the same neighborhood runs $3,500. That's a $4,700 gap, every single month, for the same roof over your head. And San Francisco isn't even the worst offender.

The 5% Rule

Take a home's value and multiply by 5%. That gives you a rough annual cost of ownership — mortgage interest, property taxes, maintenance, opportunity cost on your down payment. A $1.4 million home? $70,000 a year, or $5,833 a month in ownership cost alone. If you can rent for less, renting wins.

In San Francisco, comparable rent is $3,500 — $2,300 less than the ownership cost. Flip it to Memphis: median home at $220,000, ownership cost $917 a month, but comparable rent runs $1,400. Buying wins by $483. The 5% rule flips depending on what zip code you're standing in.

Price-to-Rent Ratios Tell the Story

Divide median home price by annual rent for a similar place. Below 15, buying favors you. Between 15 and 20, it's a coin flip. Above 20, renting wins — don't fight the math.

San Francisco's price-to-rent ratio: 38. You're paying nearly 40 years of rent in purchase price. Memphis sits at 11. Cleveland, 12. Indianapolis, 13. These are markets where buy-and-hold math actually pencils.

Geographic Arbitrage: Rent Here, Invest There

You don't have to live where you invest. Rent where you earn your income and invest where the numbers work. A software engineer in San Francisco pulling $180,000 a year can rent for $3,500 and deploy capital in Cleveland, Memphis, and Indianapolis. That same $280,000 down payment buys a triplex in Cleveland at $380,000 with $800 a month in cash flow. Do that three times and you've got $2,400 a month in cash flow plus three appreciating assets — while still living near your job.

Compare that to the person who bought the $1.4 million house: one asset with negative cash flow of $4,700 a month, entire net worth locked into a single zip code.

The HCOL House Hack

If you want to buy in an expensive market, house hacking is the one strategy that pencils. Find a duplex in an HCOL-adjacent market — Oakland, parts of Sacramento — where a duplex runs $600,000-$800,000. Put 3.5% down with an FHA loan on a $700,000 duplex: $24,500 down, PITI about $4,200. Rent the other unit for $2,500 and your effective housing cost drops to $1,700 a month. Less than half what you'd pay renting in San Francisco — and you're building equity.

Your Move This Week

Pull up your city's price-to-rent ratio. If it's above 20, you're probably better off renting and deploying capital elsewhere. If it's below 15, buying makes sense — and house hacking cuts the cost even further. The wealthiest investors I know rent in expensive cities and own cash-flowing rentals in markets they've never set foot in.

Resources Mentioned

Was this helpful?