
Logan, UT-ID
The numbers that matter most
What an investor checks first when sizing up a new metro — affordability ratio, rent vs income, cap rate proxy, and where the market is moving. Each metric shown vs. state and national medians for instant context.
moderate
Price to income
4.99×
The single most-cited 'is this market still cheap' check. Below 3× and you're in an affordability tailwind.
- vs Utah
- 5.03×-0.04
- vs U.S.
- 3.43×
Benchmark
ACS median home value ÷ median HHI
comfortable
Rent to income
19.2%
What share of a typical household's income goes to rent. Below 30% means tenants can absorb modest rent increases.
- vs Utah
- 19.7%-0.5
- vs U.S.
- 23.3%-4.1
Benchmark
(HUD FMR 2BR × 12) ÷ median HHI
tight
Cap rate proxy
2.50%
Rough first-pass yield assuming a 35% expense ratio. Not an underwriting number — a 'is this even worth modeling' filter.
- vs Utah
- 2.64%
- vs U.S.
- 4.35%
Benchmark
(FMR 2BR × 12 × 0.65) ÷ ACS median home value
steady
Net migration
+0.07%
Forward-looking demand signal. Positive net migration drives rent growth and absorbs new supply.
- vs Utah
- 0.19%
- vs U.S.
- 0.03%+0.04
Benchmark
IRS net migration ÷ population
strong
Permit pipeline
7.89
permits per 1,000 residents
Forward-supply indicator. Above ~5 means the metro is building meaningfully relative to its size; below 2 means supply is tight.
- vs Utah
- 7.89=
- vs U.S.
- 3.52+4.37
Benchmark
Census BPS permits TTM ÷ population × 1,000
healthy
Unemployment
3.0%
Tighter unemployment means higher wages, more rental demand, lower vacancy.
- vs Utah
- 3.4%-0.4
- vs U.S.
- 3.9%-0.9
Benchmark
BLS LAUS, latest month
Where prices are and where they've been
5-year price appreciation
+56.8%
homeValues.yearOverYear
+2.0%
Median home value
$386,700
The rent ladder
| Bedroom | Monthly | Annual | % of median HHI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BR | $946 | $11,352 | 14.6% |
| 2 BR | $1,241 | $14,892 | 19.2% |
| 3 BR | $1,726 | $20,712 | 26.7% |
Labor market direction
Unemployment
3.0%
Median household income
$77,520
What's being built
Total TTM
1,174
+20.5% YoY
Single-family
912
2–4 unit
0
5+ unit
262
All 2 counties, ranked by population
| County | Population | Home value | Median HHI | Permits TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cache County | 134,428 | $392,800 | $78,292 | 1,108 | +22.4% |
| Franklin County | 14,376 | $304,000 | $65,991 | 66 |
Similar metros nationally
| Metro | Pop | Med HHI | P/I | Cap proxy | HPI 5y | Permits/1k | Unemp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★Logan | 148,804 | $77,520 | 4.99× | 2.50% | +56.8% | 7.89 | 3.0% |
| Lebanon, PA | 143,258 | $76,350 | — | — | +59.5% | — | 3.2% |
| Monroe, MI | 154,823 | $75,272 | — | — | +44.1% | — | 4.6% |
| Santa Fe, NM | 154,481 | $74,689 | — | — | +52.6% | — | 3.6% |
| Chambersburg-Waynesboro, PA | 156,084 | $74,946 | — | — | +51.2% | — | 3.1% |
| Idaho Falls, ID | 158,478 | $77,300 | — | — | +50.2% | — | 3.0% |
Where people are moving in from
Net migration
+108
+0.07% of population
| Origin county | Tax returns |
|---|---|
| Salt Lake County, UT | 490 |
| Utah County, UT | 354 |
| Davis County, UT | 262 |
| Weber County, UT | 209 |
| Box Elder County, UT | 175 |
| Cache County, UT | 143 |
Who lives in Logan
- Median age
- 26
- Bachelor's+
- 38.3%
- Owner-occupancy
- 64.8%
- Vacancy rate
- 5.1%
- Rent burdened (30%+)
- 43.0%
- Median household income
- $77,520
This page shows federally sourced data. A full editorial analysis with charts and investment commentary is in progress.
