
Stockton, CA
**The Bay Area cost-refugee gateway, with the California cooldown finally arriving.** Stockton runs HPI **+34.5% over 5yr** but **YoY −1.16% — negative current-year, the California correction is here**. P/I 5.59 expensive but **BELOW the CA state median 5.95**, R/I 23.6% comfortable (well below CA median 28.79%), Cap proxy **2.7% tight**. Permits 3.12/1k normal (above CA state median 2.39) but **YoY −21% slowing**. **99.9% single-family construction.** Migration **+1,343 (+0.17% steady)** — top origin Alameda County (Bay Area refugees). 2nd-largest Central Valley metro. Anchored by Port of Stockton (inland), agricultural processing, University of the Pacific.
The numbers that matter most
What an investor checks first when sizing up a new metro — affordability ratio, rent vs income, cap rate proxy, and where the market is moving. Each metric shown vs. state and national medians for instant context.
expensive
Price to income
5.59×
The single most-cited 'is this market still cheap' check. Below 3× and you're in an affordability tailwind.
- vs California
- 5.95×-0.36
- vs U.S.
- 3.43×
Benchmark
ACS median home value ÷ median HHI
comfortable
Rent to income
23.6%
What share of a typical household's income goes to rent. Below 30% means tenants can absorb modest rent increases.
- vs California
- 28.8%-5.2
- vs U.S.
- 23.3%
Benchmark
(HUD FMR 2BR × 12) ÷ median HHI
tight
Cap rate proxy
2.7%
Rough first-pass yield assuming a 35% expense ratio. Not an underwriting number — a 'is this even worth modeling' filter.
- vs California
- 3.1%
- vs U.S.
- 4.4%
Benchmark
(FMR 2BR × 12 × 0.65) ÷ ACS median home value
steady
Net migration
+0.17%
Forward-looking demand signal. Positive net migration drives rent growth and absorbs new supply.
- vs California
- -0.03%+0.21
- vs U.S.
- 0.04%+0.14
Benchmark
IRS net migration ÷ population
pipeline contracting
Permit pipeline
3.12
permits per 1,000 residents
Forward-supply indicator. Above ~5 means the metro is building meaningfully relative to its size; below 2 means supply is tight.
- vs California
- 2.39+0.73
- vs U.S.
- 3.49
Benchmark
Census BPS permits TTM ÷ population × 1,000
softening
Unemployment
—
Tighter unemployment means higher wages, more rental demand, lower vacancy.
- vs California
- 4.8%
- vs U.S.
- 4.0%
Benchmark
BLS LAUS, latest month
Section index — click any row to jump
What the data says about Stockton
Stockton, CA is home to 779,445 residents in a single county — San Joaquin. The metro pulled 2,434 building permits over the trailing twelve months according to the Census Bureau Building Permits Survey — 3.12 per 1,000 residents, slightly below the national pace of 3.49 but above the California state median of 2.39. That puts Stockton in the upper half of California's building hierarchy. The cap rate proxy sits at 2.7% — tight — and the price-to-income ratio is 5.59 expensive (though, notably, below the California state median of 5.95, which tells you everything about the rest of the state). Median household income is $88,531, the highest of any T5 metro outside coastal CA.
But here's the structural story: Stockton ran HPI +34.5% over five years — middle of the pack — and YoY is now −1.16%, NEGATIVE. The California correction is here. Stockton joins North Port and Phoenix as one of the few queue metros currently posting a current-year price decline, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency HPI. And permit YoY is −20.95% — sharp deceleration. This metro is in active cooldown. The question isn't whether the cooldown is real — it's whether it's deep enough to be the buying signal.
The county-by-county view is unusual because Stockton is a single-county metro — one of the few in the queue. But the geography inside San Joaquin County matters:
- Tracy and Manteca (southwest, on I-205/I-5) are the growth nodes — they sit within 90 minutes of Oakland and San Jose. Both absorb Bay Area outflow at the edge of the affordable commute belt.
- Stockton city itself is mature urban — older housing stock, less greenfield, more redevelopment than expansion. The Port of Stockton (an inland port, accessible from San Francisco Bay via the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta) anchors industrial.
- Lodi (north) is wine country — Zinfandel capital of the world, smaller urban footprint, slower build pace.
- Construction is 99.9% single-family (2,432 SF / 2 multi-2-4 / 0 multi-5+). Stockton does NOT build apartments at scale. This is suburban Central Valley sprawl, not an urban infill story.
What's changing: net IRS migration is +1,343 returns (+0.17% of population) — modestly positive but well above the California state median of −0.034% (California is bleeding population overall; Stockton is one of the few CA metros still gaining). The top origin counties tell the entire story: Alameda County (+3,895 returns), Santa Clara County (+2,567), Stanislaus County (+1,551), Sacramento County (+1,274), Contra Costa County (+1,091), San Mateo County (+484). Bay Area cost refugees driving inland, plus internal Central Valley shuffling. According to IRS Statistics of Income, this Bay Area outflow has been steady for a decade — Stockton's affordability gap to Oakland/San Jose is structural, not cyclical. Owner-occupancy is 61.5% — below the national median, reflecting the metro's history as a renter-heavy agricultural workforce hub.
So what does an investor do?
- If you're hunting cash flow — pass. The cap proxy is 2.7% tight and the metro's ~$495K median home value combined with a $1,742 Fair Market Rent doesn't pencil. Stockton has never been a cash-flow market and 2026 isn't going to change that.
- If you're playing appreciation — the YoY −1.16% IS the entry signal. Stockton is the affordability gateway for the Bay Area, and as long as Alameda County remains 4-5x more expensive than Stockton, the population pump keeps flowing. Buy the cooldown — 12 to 24 months out the YoY flips back positive. Focus on Tracy and Manteca, not the Stockton city core.
- If you already own here — you compounded ~35% over 5 years (modest). Hold. Refinance if your rate is from 2022-2023. Don't add at the current cap rate level — but don't sell into the dip either. The Bay Area structural premium isn't going away.
Where prices are and where they've been
FHFA House Price Index — repeat-sales index across the metro, sized against this metro's median household income and benchmarked against the Indiana metros average and U.S. metros average.
5-year price appreciation
+34.5%
FHFA HPI · Q1 2020 → Q4 2025
-1.2% YoY
$494,500 median home value
Stockton home prices climbed 34.5% over the last 5 years according to the FHFA repeat-sales index — a modest appreciation pace for a Midwest metro of this size. The 1-year change is negative (-1.2%), signaling the market is cooling.
See the chart below for how the metro's appreciation curve stacks up against the Indiana metros average and the U.S. metros average. The gap between the metro and the national line is the "catch-up" or "lag" signal — and the slope tells you whether the gap is widening or closing.

How to read it
- 01Stockton ran **+34.5% over five years** — modest by California standards but still beating the U.S. metros average (+34.3%) by a hair.
- 02**Recent YoY is −1.16% — NEGATIVE current-year HPI**. The California correction is here. Stockton is one of the few queue metros currently posting a price decline.
- 03Inside California, Stockton ranks **#14 of 26 for 5-year HPI** — middle of the state. **#10 by population, #8 by permits**.
- 04U.S. metros ran **+34.3%** over the same window. Stockton was right at the U.S. average — no California premium, no California penalty over 5 years.
- 05The takeaway: Stockton is the **Bay Area cost-refugee gateway** — Alameda, Santa Clara, and Contra Costa County residents driving inland for affordability. The current-year correction is the entry signal.
Where the value tier sits — top 1 counties by home value
| County | Median home value | Median HHI | Price-to-income | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Joaquin County | $494,500 | $88,531 | 5.59× | stretched |
How to read the FHFA House Price Index
FHFA HPI is a repeat-sales index — it tracks the price change of the same properties over time, smoothing out new construction and luxury transactions. It's built from the mortgage data the GSEs (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac) already see, which makes it free of MLS survey error and immune to listing-feed gaps.
- 01Repeat-sales method. Tracks the same properties over time, so new construction and luxury transactions don't skew the trend.
- 02Federally sourced. Built from GSE mortgage data — no MLS survey error, no commercial license required to publish.
- 03Slope, not level. Watch the slope of the line, not the absolute index value — a steepening curve is a more reliable buy signal than the level.
The rent ladder
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count, sized against this metro's median household income and benchmarked vs Indiana and the U.S.
Typical 2-bedroom rent
$1,742
/ month · HUD FMR FY 2026
23.6% of median HHI
A typical 2-bedroom in costs the median household 23.6% of their income — 0.3 points above the U.S. average (23.3%) 5.2 points below California (28.8%).
HUD calls anything above 30% "rent-burdened." This metro sits comfortably under that line, which means tenants can absorb modest rent increases — and landlords have headroom on rent hikes before pushing tenants out of the market.
Fair Market Rent — by bedroom count
| Bedroom | Monthly | Annual | % of median HHI | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BR | $1,395 | $16.7K | 18.9% | comfortable |
| 2 BR | $1,742 | $20.9K | 23.6% | comfortable |
| 3 BR | $2,423 | $29.1K | 32.8% | rent-burdened |
Why HUD Fair Market Rent matters
FMR is HUD's 40th-percentile rent estimate by bedroom count — refreshed every fiscal year, sourced from Census surveys (not commercial listing data), and used as the cap for Section 8 voucher payments. Three things investors should know:
- 01Defensible benchmark. Federal source, no commercial license required to publish or compare against.
- 02Section 8 ceiling. A property at or below FMR is voucher-eligible — government-paid rent at the FMR cap.
- 03Conservative estimate. 40th percentile means more than half of actual market rents in the metro come in higher.
Labor market direction
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — LAUS (unemployment) + CES (nonfarm employment), benchmarked against the U.S. average.
Unemployment rate
—
BLS LAUS · latest month
Stockton's labor market is softening, with unemployment running at —.
For an investor, tighter unemployment means higher wages, more rental demand, and lower vacancy. The trend chart below shows how the metro's unemployment has moved over the last 30 months.
Unemployment rate
—
Nonfarm jobs
—
Median household income
$88,531
ACS 5-year
How to read the labor market
Two BLS series tell you almost everything you need about a metro's labor market: LAUS (unemployment, refreshed monthly) and CES (nonfarm payroll counts, refreshed monthly). LAUS is the tightness signal; CES is the size and direction signal.
- 01Unemployment is rental demand. Tighter labor markets mean higher wages and lower vacancy — landlords have pricing power when employers are competing for workers.
- 02YoY change is the trend signal. A negative pp YoY change means the labor market tightened over the last year — usually a leading indicator for rent growth.
- 03Nonfarm growth is supply absorption. Positive nonfarm payroll growth absorbs new housing supply and supports the rent + price trajectory together.
What's being built
U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey — trailing 12 months, broken out by structure type, with the YoY change as the directional signal.
Total permits TTM
2,434
Census BPS · trailing 12 months
-21.0% year-over-year
3.12 permits per 1,000 residents
Stockton pulled 2,434 building permits over the trailing 12 months, a contraction 21.0% year-over-year. That works out to 3.12 permits per 1,000 residents, vs the U.S. metros average of 3.49.
Single-family vs multifamily mix matters: 5+ unit permits are lumpy (developers file for entire projects at once), while single-family permits are smoother and more reliable as a demand signal. The chart below breaks out the monthly mix.
Single family
2,432
trailing 12 months
2–4 unit
2
trailing 12 months
5+ unit
0
trailing 12 months
How to read the supply pipeline
Census BPS publishes building permit counts every month at the county level, by structure type. Single-family permits are the smooth signal — they reflect ongoing builder demand. 5+ unit permits are lumpy and project-level — one apartment approval can spike a month.
- 01Permits per 1,000 residents. The size-adjusted comparison number. Above ~5 means the metro is building meaningfully relative to its population; below 2 means supply is tight.
- 02YoY change is the direction. Year-over-year change in TTM permits tells you whether builders are leaning in or pulling back. Watch this number for trend reversals.
- 03Mix matters for cap rates. Heavy 5+ unit permitting tends to compress cap rates; single-family-dominated pipelines preserve them.
All 1 counties, ranked by population
Census Bureau (population, ACS demographics) + Census Building Permits Survey.

How to read it
- 01**San Joaquin County is the entire metro — 2,434 TTM permits = 3.12 per 1,000** — Stockton, Lodi, Tracy, Manteca, Lathrop, Ripon, Escalon. 100% of the pipeline.
- 02Stockton runs **3.12 permits per 1,000 residents** — below the national 3.49 but **above the California state median of 2.39**.
- 03**Permit YoY is −20.95%** — sharp deceleration. Construction is pulling back as the California cooldown bites.
- 04**99.9% single-family construction** (2,432 SF / 2 multi-2-4 / 0 multi-5+). Stockton is suburban Central Valley — no apartment construction at scale.
- 05Tracy and Manteca are the actual growth nodes — they're inside the I-5/I-205 commute belt to the East Bay (90 min to Oakland).

How to read the map
- 01**San Joaquin County is the entire MSA at 3.12 per 1,000** — Stockton city core, Lodi (north, wine country), Tracy/Manteca/Lathrop (southwest, Bay Area commute belt), Escalon (east).
- 02**Tracy and Manteca are the building hotspots** — they sit on I-205/I-5 and are within 90 minutes of Oakland/San Jose. Both are absorbing Bay Area outflow.
- 03**Stockton city itself is mature urban** — older housing stock, less greenfield. The growth is in the southwest suburban band.
- 04**The metro builds at 3.12/1k vs the California state median of 2.39** — above the state average but below the national 3.49. Constrained by water (Delta + agricultural rights) and land use politics.
- 05San Joaquin County is the gateway between the Bay Area and the Central Valley — geographically, economically, and politically.
| # | County | Population | Median HHI | Home value | Permits TTM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Joaquin County | 779,445 | $88,531 | $494,500 | 2,434 |
Similar metros nationally
5 metros closest to Stockton by population and median household income — head-to-head on the metrics that matter for an investor.
Peer set
5
metros nearest by population + HHI
Stockton is closest in size to Colorado Springs, Boise City, Charleston, Des Moines.
The table below ranks every metric — green cells mark the best value in the column, rust cells mark the worst. Stockton is highlighted as the focal row.
| Metro | Pop | Med HHI | Home value | P/I | Cap proxy | HPI 5y | Permits/1k | Migration | Unemp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
★Stockton | 0.78M | $89K | $495K | 5.59× | 2.7% | +34.5% | 3.12 | +0.17% | — |
Colorado Springs, CO | 0.76M | $87K | $432K | 4.95× | 3.1% | +37.7% | 7.54 | +0.19% | — |
Boise City, ID | 0.77M | $83K | $434K | 5.25× | 3.0% | +45.7% | 11.86 | +0.65% | 3.2% |
Charleston-North Charleston, SC | 0.80M | $82K | $345K | 4.20× | 4.0% | +69.1% | 9.01 | +0.42% | — |
Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA | 0.71M | $84K | $252K | 3.00× | 4.1% | +41.5% | 7.80 | +0.05% | — |
New Haven-Milford, CT | 0.87M | $86K | $328K | 3.81× | — | +61.1% | — | — | — |
How to read this comparison
Peer metros are picked by population + median household income — the closest five matches nationally — so the comparison is apples-to-apples on size and economic class. Sun Belt entrants like Las Vegas and Nashville are included when they fall in range, which is why this peer set spans both the Midwest and the Sun Belt.
- 01Green = best in column. The cell with the most-favorable value for that metric, accounting for whether higher or lower is better.
- 02Rust = worst in column. The cell with the least-favorable value. Combined with the green markers, this is your at-a-glance "where does my metro win and where does it lose."
- 03Cap proxy is the yield lens. Cap rate proxy = (FMR 2BR × 12 × 0.65) ÷ median home value. A first-pass yield filter, not an underwriting number — but it puts the peer set on a single comparable scale.
Where people are moving in from
IRS Statistics of Income — Tax Year 2022. Excludes intra-metro suburban churn.
Net migration
+1,343
tax returns · IRS SOI · TY 2022
+0.17% of metro population
3,895 from top origin
The IRS data lags by ~2 years (households file taxes the year after they move), but it's the only nationwide county-to-county migration data sourced from administrative records, not survey estimates. The table below shows the top origin counties — the gravitational sources of new residents.
Top origin counties — where new residents are coming from
| Origin county | Tax returns |
|---|---|
| Alameda County, CA | 3,895 |
| Santa Clara County, CA | 2,567 |
| Stanislaus County, CA | 1,551 |
| Sacramento County, CA | 1,274 |
| Contra Costa County, CA | 1,091 |
| San Mateo County, CA | 484 |
Who lives in Stockton
U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates · 2019–2023 vintage.
Who lives here
- Median age
- 35.2
- Owner-occupancy
- 61.5%
- Bachelor's+
- 21.6%
Stockton young Midwest metro: Median age 35.2, 61.5% owner-occupancy 21.6% holding a bachelor's degree or higher. Stable, educated, and mostly homeowner-driven.
The catch: 49.6% of renter households are rent-burdened (paying 30%+ of income on rent) — high enough to flag as a constraint on rent growth even though the headline rent-to-income ratio looks comfortable.
- Median household income
- $88,531
- Median age
- 35.2
- Bachelor's+ degree
- 21.6%
- Owner-occupancy rate
- 61.5%
- Vacancy rate
- 6.0%
- Rent burdened (30%+)
- 49.6%
Data sources
| Metric | Source | Type | Vintage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home prices | FHFA — House Price Index | Index | Q4 2025 |
| Fair market rents | HUD — Fair Market Rents | Administrative | FY 2026 |
| Unemployment rate | BLS — Local Area Unemployment Statistics | Survey | Dec 2025 |
| Nonfarm employment | BLS — Current Employment Statistics | Survey | Dec 2025 |
| Building permits | Census — Building Permits Survey | Survey | Mar 2026 TTM |
| Migration flows | IRS — Statistics of Income, Migration Data | Administrative | Tax Year 2022 |
| Demographics | Census — American Community Survey 5-Year | Survey | 2019–2023 |
| Household income | Census — American Community Survey 5-Year | Survey | 2019–2023 |
Page last refreshed: April 9, 2026
